Browsing versus Studying: A Pro-market Case for Regulation
Browsing versus Studying: A Pro-market Case for Regulation
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Oxford University Press
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
We identify a competition-policy-based argument for regulating the secondary features of complex or complexly priced products when consumers have limited attention. Limited attention implies that consumers can only “study” a small number of complex products in full, while—by failing to check secondary features—they can superficially “browse” more....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Browsing versus Studying: A Pro-market Case for Regulation
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_restud_rdaa056
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_restud_rdaa056
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0034-6527
E-ISSN
1467-937X
DOI
10.1093/restud/rdaa056
