Log in to save to my catalogue

Revisiting Ventzislavov's Thesis: “Curating Should Be Understood as a Fine Art”: Discussion

Revisiting Ventzislavov's Thesis: “Curating Should Be Understood as a Fine Art”: Discussion

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jaac_12252

Revisiting Ventzislavov's Thesis: “Curating Should Be Understood as a Fine Art”: Discussion

About this item

Full title

Revisiting Ventzislavov's Thesis: “Curating Should Be Understood as a Fine Art”: Discussion

Author / Creator

Journal title

The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism, 2016-01, Vol.74 (1), p.87-91

Language

English

Formats

More information

Alternative Titles

Full title

Revisiting Ventzislavov's Thesis: “Curating Should Be Understood as a Fine Art”: Discussion

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Author / Creator

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jaac_12252

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jaac_12252

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0021-8529

DOI

10.1111/jaac.12252

How to access this item