Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership...
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Healy, Patricia , Galvin, Sandra , Williamson, Paula R. , Treweek, Shaun , Whiting, Caroline , Maeso, Beccy , Bray, Christopher , Brocklehurst, Peter , Moloney, Mary Clarke , Douiri, Abdel , Gamble, Carrol , Gardner, Heidi R. , Mitchell, Derick , Stewart, Derek , Jordan, Joan , O’Donnell, Martin , Clarke, Mike , Pavitt, Sue H. , Guegan, Eleanor Woodford , Blatch-Jones, Amanda , Smith, Valerie , Reay, Hannah and Devane, Declan
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Despite the problem of inadequate recruitment to randomised trials, there is little evidence to guide researchers on decisions about how people are effectively recruited to take part in trials. The PRioRiTy study aimed to identify and prioritise important unanswered trial recruitment questions for research. The PRioRiTy study - Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) included members of the public approached to take part in a randomised trial or who have represented participants on randomised trial steering committees, health professionals and research staff with experience of recruiting to randomised trials, people who have designed, conducted, analysed or reported on randomised trials and people with experience of randomised trials methodology.
This partnership was aided by the James Lind Alliance and involved eight stages: (i) identifying a unique, relevant prioritisation area within trial methodology; (ii) establishing a steering group (iii) identifying and engaging with partners and stakeholders; (iv) formulating an initial list of uncertainties; (v) collating the uncertainties into research questions; (vi) confirming that the questions for research are a current recruitment challenge; (vii) shortlisting questions and (viii) final prioritisation through a face-to-face workshop.
A total of 790 survey respondents yielded 1693 open-text answers to 6 questions, from which 1880 potential questions for research were identified. After merging duplicates, the number of questions was reduced to 496. Questions were combined further, and those that were submitted by fewer than 15 people and/or fewer than 6 of the 7 stakeholder groups were excluded from the next round of prioritisation resulting in 31 unique questions for research. All 31 questions were confirmed as being unanswered after checking relevant, up-to-date research evidence. The 10 highest priority questions were ranked at a face-to-face workshop. The number 1 ranked question was "How can randomised trials become part of routine care and best utilise current clinical care pathways?" The top 10 research questions can be viewed at www.priorityresearch.ie .
The prioritised questions call for a collective focus on normalising trials as part of clinical care, enhancing communication, addressing barriers, enablers and motivators around participation and exploring greater public involvement in the research process....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Galvin, Sandra
Williamson, Paula R.
Treweek, Shaun
Whiting, Caroline
Maeso, Beccy
Bray, Christopher
Brocklehurst, Peter
Moloney, Mary Clarke
Douiri, Abdel
Gamble, Carrol
Gardner, Heidi R.
Mitchell, Derick
Stewart, Derek
Jordan, Joan
O’Donnell, Martin
Clarke, Mike
Pavitt, Sue H.
Guegan, Eleanor Woodford
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
Smith, Valerie
Reay, Hannah
Devane, Declan
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01587a4f424c483bbd1f311fbbd427e4
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01587a4f424c483bbd1f311fbbd427e4
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1745-6215
E-ISSN
1745-6215
DOI
10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4