Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for...

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_11ff21f9f0f84bca8537b81da6250e2b

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study

About this item

Full title

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study

Publisher

Tokyo: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Journal title

DEN Open, 2023-04, Vol.3 (1), p.e163-n/a

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Tokyo: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Objectives
Endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR‐L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both standard endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in size. However, there is no definitive consensus on which is better. Here, we compared the efficacy of ESMR‐L and ESD for small rectal NE...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter retrospective study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_11ff21f9f0f84bca8537b81da6250e2b

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_11ff21f9f0f84bca8537b81da6250e2b

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2692-4609

E-ISSN

2692-4609

DOI

10.1002/deo2.163

How to access this item