Log in to save to my catalogue

In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary int...

In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary int...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_35fc7c32a4db42db982665ca5aac8b54

In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

About this item

Full title

In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Publisher

United States: Taylor & Francis

Journal title

Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2020-09, Vol.10 (5), p.436-442

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Taylor & Francis

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

We compared the in-hospital complications, outcomes, cost, and length of stay (LOS) between angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the USA.
A nationwide inpatient database was queried to identify patients >18 years w...

Alternative Titles

Full title

In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_35fc7c32a4db42db982665ca5aac8b54

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_35fc7c32a4db42db982665ca5aac8b54

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2000-9666

E-ISSN

2000-9666

DOI

10.1080/20009666.2020.1800970

How to access this item