False claims of equivalence in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factor...
False claims of equivalence in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors—a systematic review protocol
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
IntroductionResearch quality within the neurosurgical field remains suboptimal. Therefore, many studies published in the neurosurgical literature lack enough statistical power to establish the presence or absence of clinically important differences between treatment arms. The field of neurotrauma deals with additional challenges, with fewer financi...
Alternative Titles
Full title
False claims of equivalence in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors—a systematic review protocol
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4050709edee245938b23d67f1c4fb6f6
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4050709edee245938b23d67f1c4fb6f6
Other Identifiers
ISSN
2044-6055
E-ISSN
2044-6055
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044794
