Log in to save to my catalogue

VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4064660b89f54b7e866904af25ed4301

VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

About this item

Full title

VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

Journal title

Scientific reports, 2025-03, Vol.15 (1), p.9946-8, Article 9946

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

In high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (HRNDMM), two different induction regimens were evaluated for safety and efficacy: Bortezomib-Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (VPd) and Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRd). Newly diagnosed high-risk MM patients(age > 18) were included in this retrospective study, who received VRd and VPd induction th...

Alternative Titles

Full title

VRd vs. VPd as induction therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4064660b89f54b7e866904af25ed4301

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4064660b89f54b7e866904af25ed4301

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2045-2322

E-ISSN

2045-2322

DOI

10.1038/s41598-025-85398-0

How to access this item