Patient Voices: Multimethod Study on the Feasibility of Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Out...
Patient Voices: Multimethod Study on the Feasibility of Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Comprehensive Cancer Center
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Brunelli, Cinzia , Alfieri, Sara , Zito, Emanuela , Spelta, Marco , Arba, Laura , Lombi, Linda , Caselli, Luana , Caraceni, Augusto , Borreani, Claudia , Roli, Anna , Miceli, Rosalba , Tine', Gabriele , Zecca, Ernesto , Platania, Marco , Procopio, Giuseppe , Nicolai, Nicola , Battaglia, Luigi , Lozza, Laura , Shkodra, Morena , Massa, Giacomo , Loiacono, Daniele and Apolone, Giovanni
Publisher
Canada: JMIR Publications
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Canada: JMIR Publications
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
"Patient Voices" is a software developed to promote the systematic collection of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in routine oncology clinical practice.
This study aimed to assess compliance with and feasibility of the Patient Voices ePROM system and analyze patient-related barriers in an Italian comprehensive cancer center.
Consecutive patients with cancer attending 3 outpatient clinics and 3 inpatient wards were screened for eligibility (adults, native speakers, and being able to fill in the ePROMs) and enrolled in a quantitative and qualitative multimethod study. Compliance, reasons for not administering the ePROMs, patients' interaction needs, and patient-perceived System Usability Scale (range 0-100) were collected; semistructured interviews were carried out in a subsample of patients.
From June 2020 to September 2021, a total of 435 patients were screened, 421 (96.7%) were eligible, and 309 completed the ePROMs (309/421, 73.4%; 95% CI 69.8%-77.5%; mean age 63.3, SD 13.7 years). Organization problems and patient refusal were the main reasons for not administering the ePROMs (outpatients: 40/234, 17.1% and inpatients: 44/201, 21.9%). Help for tablet use was needed by 27.8% (47/169) of outpatients and 10.7% (15/140) of inpatients, while the support received for item interpretation was similar in the 2 groups (outpatients: 36/169, 21.3% and inpatients: 26/140, 18.6%). Average System Usability Scale scores indicated high usability in both groups (outpatients: mean 86.8, SD 15.8 and inpatients: mean 83.9, SD 18.8). Overall, repeated measurement compliance was 76.9% (173/225; outpatients only). Interviewed patients showed positive attitudes toward ePROMs. However, there are barriers to implementation related to the time and cognitive effort required to complete the questionnaires. There is also skepticism about the usefulness of ePROMs in interactions with health care professionals.
This study provides useful information for future ePROM implementation strategies, aimed at effectively supporting the routine clinical management and care of patients with cancer. In addition, these findings may be relevant to other organizations willing to systematically collect PROMs or ePROMs in their clinical routines.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03968718; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03968718....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Patient Voices: Multimethod Study on the Feasibility of Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Comprehensive Cancer Center
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Alfieri, Sara
Zito, Emanuela
Spelta, Marco
Arba, Laura
Lombi, Linda
Caselli, Luana
Caraceni, Augusto
Borreani, Claudia
Roli, Anna
Miceli, Rosalba
Tine', Gabriele
Zecca, Ernesto
Platania, Marco
Procopio, Giuseppe
Nicolai, Nicola
Battaglia, Luigi
Lozza, Laura
Shkodra, Morena
Massa, Giacomo
Loiacono, Daniele
Apolone, Giovanni
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43bec275c7644baea21ae7b5c7c26dab
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43bec275c7644baea21ae7b5c7c26dab
Other Identifiers
ISSN
2369-1999
E-ISSN
2369-1999
DOI
10.2196/56625