Log in to save to my catalogue

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a...

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65f363071b714ba8a35af6b28998198e

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

About this item

Full title

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

Journal title

Scientific reports, 2021-03, Vol.11 (1), p.6613-13, Article 6613

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Acute obstructive uropathy is associated with significant morbidity among patients with any condition that leads to urinary tract obstruction. Immediate urinary diversion is necessary to prevent further damage to the kidneys. In many centres, the two main treatment options include percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and retrograde ureteral stenting (RUS...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus retrograde ureteral stenting for acute upper obstructive uropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65f363071b714ba8a35af6b28998198e

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65f363071b714ba8a35af6b28998198e

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2045-2322

E-ISSN

2045-2322

DOI

10.1038/s41598-021-86136-y

How to access this item