Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning vs open reduction and internal fixation in pediatric later...
Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning vs open reduction and internal fixation in pediatric lateral condylar humerus fractures displaced by > 4 mm: an observational cross-sectional study
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Xie, Li-wei , Deng, Zhi-qiang , Zhao, Ren-huan , Wang, Juan , Liu, Xin , Zhou, Ying and Zhang, Hui
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is recommended for lateral condylar humerus fractures (LCHFs) displaced by > 4 mm, several studies have reported the use of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) to treat LCHFs with significant displacement. However, little is known about the clinical differences between these two surg...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning vs open reduction and internal fixation in pediatric lateral condylar humerus fractures displaced by > 4 mm: an observational cross-sectional study
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_66e0504d2fd84f54a47df016de3b7c09
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_66e0504d2fd84f54a47df016de3b7c09
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1471-2474
E-ISSN
1471-2474
DOI
10.1186/s12891-021-04880-8
