Log in to save to my catalogue

Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secon...

Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secon...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_68539eadd0c74ae3b5a7d177afe2a4b2

Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study

About this item

Full title

Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

BMC medical research methodology, 2022-12, Vol.22 (1), p.329-329, Article 329

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Many clinical practice guidelines are based on randomised controlled trials conducted in secondary or tertiary care setting and general practitioners frequently question their relevance for primary care patients. Our aim was to compare the intervention effect estimates between primary care setting randomised controlled trials (PC-RCTs) and secondar...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_68539eadd0c74ae3b5a7d177afe2a4b2

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_68539eadd0c74ae3b5a7d177afe2a4b2

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1471-2288

E-ISSN

1471-2288

DOI

10.1186/s12874-022-01815-2

How to access this item