Log in to save to my catalogue

Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mecha...

Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mecha...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ba5f11bde4b424c8d7f21b4824d1ce8

Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial

About this item

Full title

Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial

Publisher

China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal title

Chinese medical journal, 2022-05, Vol.135 (9), p.1043-1051

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Ciprofol (HSK3486; Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China), developed as a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative showed similar tolerability and efficacy characteristics as propofol when applicated as continuous intravenous infusion for 12 h maintenance sedation in a previous phase 1 trial. The phase 2 trial was designed to inves...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ba5f11bde4b424c8d7f21b4824d1ce8

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ba5f11bde4b424c8d7f21b4824d1ce8

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0366-6999

E-ISSN

2542-5641

DOI

10.1097/CM9.0000000000001912

How to access this item