Log in to save to my catalogue

Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the...

Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6bf18970a5de4497ae44d7dd210fec3b

Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature

About this item

Full title

Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature

Author / Creator

Publisher

Copernicus Publications

Journal title

Geoscientific model development, 2014-06, Vol.7 (3), p.1247-1250

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Copernicus Publications

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Both the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) are regularly employed in model evaluation studies. Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have suggested that the RMSE is not a good indicator of average model performance and might be a misleading indicator of average error, and thus the MAE would be a better metric for that purpose....

Alternative Titles

Full title

Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Author / Creator

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6bf18970a5de4497ae44d7dd210fec3b

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6bf18970a5de4497ae44d7dd210fec3b

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1991-9603,1991-959X

E-ISSN

1991-9603

DOI

10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014

How to access this item