Log in to save to my catalogue

Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study

Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ad6e3a0b445425ea9cf38e236c5996f

Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study

About this item

Full title

Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

BMC medical research methodology, 2021-10, Vol.21 (1), p.237-11, Article 237

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

While well-conducted systematic reviews (SRs) can provide the best evidence on the potential effectiveness of acupuncture, limitations on the methodological rigour of SRs may impact the trustworthiness of their conclusions. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of a representative sample of SRs on acupuncture effec...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ad6e3a0b445425ea9cf38e236c5996f

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ad6e3a0b445425ea9cf38e236c5996f

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1471-2288

E-ISSN

1471-2288

DOI

10.1186/s12874-021-01437-0

How to access this item