Log in to save to my catalogue

Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A syst...

Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A syst...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8b0c8afd060c473c97ccd1f573fa33fb

Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument

About this item

Full title

Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

BMC health services research, 2020-10, Vol.20 (1), p.970-970, Article 970

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide recommendations for practice, but the proliferation of CPGs issued by multiple organisations in recent years has raised concern about their quality. The aim of this study was to systematically appraise CPGs quality for low back pain (LBP) interventions and to explore inter-rater reliability (IRR) between...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8b0c8afd060c473c97ccd1f573fa33fb

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8b0c8afd060c473c97ccd1f573fa33fb

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1472-6963

E-ISSN

1472-6963

DOI

10.1186/s12913-020-05827-w

How to access this item