Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus single internal thoracic artery grafting pro...
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus single internal thoracic artery grafting procedures for multivessel coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective analysis
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
To compare two surgical strategies for myocardial revascularization: one by a minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and the other by a conventional full sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
We reviewed the early outcomes and overall survival of all the patients treated in our center by the above strategies durin...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus single internal thoracic artery grafting procedures for multivessel coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective analysis
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a58b780cbaec4053bec19a5459501578
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a58b780cbaec4053bec19a5459501578
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1749-8090
E-ISSN
1749-8090
DOI
10.1186/s13019-025-03410-0
