Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of the efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discecto...

Comparison of the efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discecto...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b3409a593dd44a998215102fe2264e30

Comparison of the efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating adolescent lumbar disc herniation

About this item

Full title

Comparison of the efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating adolescent lumbar disc herniation

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

Journal title

Scientific reports, 2025-03, Vol.15 (1), p.10185-8, Article 10185

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) has long been employed as the standard operation for adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH). However, due to iatrogenic injury, it has been suspected to cause adverse effects. Alternatively, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is considered as effective as MED. Few studies have compared MED and PELD i...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of the efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating adolescent lumbar disc herniation

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b3409a593dd44a998215102fe2264e30

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b3409a593dd44a998215102fe2264e30

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2045-2322

E-ISSN

2045-2322

DOI

10.1038/s41598-025-94635-5

How to access this item