Log in to save to my catalogue

Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review

Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b9a1c2b47af242d0a719990ce81d2eb2

Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review

About this item

Full title

Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review

Publisher

Canada: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Journal title

Journal of medical Internet research, 2022-05, Vol.24 (5), p.e33380-e33380

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Canada: Journal of Medical Internet Research

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

The recent focus on the critical setting, especially with the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the need for minimizing contact-based care and increasing robotic use. Robotics is a rising field in the context of health care, and we sought to evaluate the use of robots in critical care settings.
Although robotic presence is prevalent in the surgical setting, its role in critical care has not been well established. We aimed to examine the uses and limitations of robots for patients who are critically ill.
This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Library were searched from their inception to December 23, 2021. Included studies involved patients requiring critical care, both in intensive care units or high-dependency units, or settings that required critical care procedures (eg, intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Randomized trials and observational studies were included.
A total of 33 studies were included. The greatest application of robots in the intensive care unit was in the field of telepresence, whereby robots proved advantageous in providing a reduced response time, earlier intervention, and lower mortality rates. Challenges of telepresence included regulatory and financial barriers. In therapy and stroke rehabilitation, robots achieved superior clinical outcomes safely. Robotic use in patient evaluation and assessment was mainly through ultrasound evaluation, obtaining satisfactory to superior results with the added benefits of remote assessment, time savings, and increased efficiency. Robots in drug dispensing and delivery increased efficiency and generated cost savings. All the robots had technological limitations and hidden costs.
Overall, our results show that robotic use in critical care settings is a beneficial, effective, and well-received intervention that delivers significant benefits to patients, staff, and hospitals. Looking ahead, it is necessary to form strong ethical and legislative frameworks and overcome various regulatory and financial barriers.
PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021234162; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=234162....

Alternative Titles

Full title

Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b9a1c2b47af242d0a719990ce81d2eb2

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b9a1c2b47af242d0a719990ce81d2eb2

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1438-8871,1439-4456

E-ISSN

1438-8871

DOI

10.2196/33380

How to access this item