Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in revi...
Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Internal and external validity are the most relevant components when critically appraising randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for systematic reviews. However, there is no gold standard to assess external validity. This might be related to the heterogeneity of the terminology as well as to unclear evidence of the measurement properties of available tools. The aim of this review was to identify tools to assess the external validity of RCTs. It was further, to evaluate the quality of identified tools and to recommend the use of individual tools to assess the external validity of RCTs in future systematic reviews.
A two-phase systematic literature search was performed in four databases: PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO via OVID, and CINAHL via EBSCO. First, tools to assess the external validity of RCTs were identified. Second, studies investigating the measurement properties of these tools were selected. The measurement properties of each included tool were appraised using an adapted version of the COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.
38 publications reporting on the development or validation of 28 included tools were included. For 61% (17/28) of the included tools, there was no evidence for measurement properties. For the remaining tools, reliability was the most frequently assessed property. Reliability was judged as "sufficient" for three tools (very low certainty of evidence). Content validity was rated as "sufficient" for one tool (moderate certainty of evidence).
Based on these results, no available tool can be fully recommended to assess the external validity of RCTs in systematic reviews. Several steps are required to overcome the identified difficulties to either adapt and validate available tools or to develop a better suitable tool.
Prospective registration at Open Science Framework (OSF): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PTG4D ....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c56cd1e3653541b9aac1437dabc1ea1c
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c56cd1e3653541b9aac1437dabc1ea1c
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1471-2288
E-ISSN
1471-2288
DOI
10.1186/s12874-022-01561-5