Impact of intrawork rest breaks on doctors’ performance and well-being: systematic review
Impact of intrawork rest breaks on doctors’ performance and well-being: systematic review
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
ObjectivesTo summarise evidence on intrawork breaks and their associated effect on doctors’ well-being and/or performance at work.DesignSystematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement guidelinesData sourcesEmbase, PubMed, Web of Science (Core Collection) and PsychINFO were systematically searched on 6 June 2021.Eligibility criteriaNo restrictions were placed on language, study design or date of publication.Data extraction and analysisMethodological quality was appraised using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias (ROB-2), Cochrane’s Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies (ROBINS-I), and the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for cross-sectional, cohort and qualitative studies. Quantitative synthesis was not undertaken due to substantial heterogeneity of design and outcomes. Results are presented narratively.ResultsDatabase searches returned 10 557 results and searches of other sources returned two additional records. Thirty-two papers were included in the systematic review, comprised of 29 unique studies, participants and topics and 3 follow-up studies. A variety of well-being and performance outcome measures were used. Overall, findings indicate that intrawork breaks improved some measures of well-being and/or work performance. However, methodological quality was judged to be low with a high risk of bias in most included studies.DiscussionUsing existing evidence, it is not possible to conclude with confidence whether intrawork breaks improve well-being and/or work performance in doctors. There is much inconsistency regarding how breaks are defined, measured and the outcomes used to assess effectiveness. Future research should seek to: (a) define and standardise the measurement of breaks, (b) use valid, reliable outcome measures to evaluate their impact on well-being and performance and (c) minimise the risk of bias in studies where possible.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020156924; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=156924....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Impact of intrawork rest breaks on doctors’ performance and well-being: systematic review
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c85145295abd4e7aa684293314b768b3
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c85145295abd4e7aa684293314b768b3
Other Identifiers
ISSN
2044-6055
E-ISSN
2044-6055
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062469