Log in to save to my catalogue

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Clinical Utility of Predictive Risk Models for Chemothe...

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Clinical Utility of Predictive Risk Models for Chemothe...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ce2259cbe6d34f888764295adf13d6b4

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Clinical Utility of Predictive Risk Models for Chemotherapy-Related Symptom Management: Qualitative Exploration Using Focus Groups and Interviews

About this item

Full title

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Clinical Utility of Predictive Risk Models for Chemotherapy-Related Symptom Management: Qualitative Exploration Using Focus Groups and Interviews

Publisher

Canada: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Journal title

Journal of medical Internet research, 2024-06, Vol.26 (1), p.e49309

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Canada: Journal of Medical Internet Research

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Interest in the application of predictive risk models (PRMs) in health care to identify people most likely to experience disease and treatment-related complications is increasing. In cancer care, these techniques are focused primarily on the prediction of survival or life-threatening toxicities (eg, febrile neutropenia). Fewer studies focus on the use of PRMs for symptoms or supportive care needs. The application of PRMs to chemotherapy-related symptoms (CRS) would enable earlier identification and initiation of prompt, personalized, and tailored interventions. While some PRMs exist for CRS, few were translated into clinical practice, and human factors associated with their use were not reported.
We aim to explore patients' and clinicians' perspectives of the utility and real-world application of PRMs to improve the management of CRS.
Focus groups (N=10) and interviews (N=5) were conducted with patients (N=28) and clinicians (N=26) across 5 European countries. Interactions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically.
Both clinicians and patients recognized the value of having individualized risk predictions for CRS and appreciated how this type of information would facilitate the provision of tailored preventative treatments or supportive care interactions. However, cautious and skeptical attitudes toward the use of PRMs in clinical care were noted by both groups, particularly in relationship to the uncertainty regarding how the information would be generated. Visualization and presentation of PRM information in a usable and useful format for both patients and clinicians was identified as a challenge to their successful implementation in clinical care.
Findings from this study provide information on clinicians' and patients' perspectives on the clinical use of PRMs for the management of CRS. These international perspectives are important because they provide insight into the risks and benefits of using PRMs to evaluate CRS. In addition, they highlight the need to find ways to more effectively present and use this information in clinical practice. Further research that explores the best ways to incorporate this type of information while maintaining the human side of care is warranted.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02356081; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02356081....

Alternative Titles

Full title

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Clinical Utility of Predictive Risk Models for Chemotherapy-Related Symptom Management: Qualitative Exploration Using Focus Groups and Interviews

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ce2259cbe6d34f888764295adf13d6b4

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ce2259cbe6d34f888764295adf13d6b4

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1438-8871,1439-4456

E-ISSN

1438-8871

DOI

10.2196/49309

How to access this item