Log in to save to my catalogue

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the...

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d2d527f021da4bc98cd27bae7d4bdc4e

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the Combined OPUS/OrPHeUS Studies

About this item

Full title

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the Combined OPUS/OrPHeUS Studies

Publisher

Cheshire: Springer Healthcare

Journal title

Pulmonary therapy, 2024-03, Vol.10 (1), p.85-107

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Cheshire: Springer Healthcare

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Introduction
Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) carries a worse prognosis than other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Data regarding use of PAH-specific therapies in patients with PoPH are sparse as they are usually excluded from clinical trials. This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety profiles in patients with PoPH newly initiating macitentan in the USA using the OPUS/OrPHeUS combined dataset.
Methods
OPUS was a prospective, US, multicenter, observational drug registry (April 2014–June 2020); OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter chart review (October 2013–March 2017). Additional information regarding patients’ liver disease was retrospectively collected for patients with PoPH in OPUS.
Results
The OPUS/OrPHeUS dataset included 206 patients with PoPH (median age 58 years; 52.4% female), with baseline cirrhosis and liver test abnormalities reported in 72.8% and 31.6% of patients respectively. Macitentan was initiated as combination therapy in 74.8% of patients and median (Q1, Q3) exposure to macitentan was 11.9 (3.1, 26.0) months. One-year Kaplan–Meier estimates (95% confidence limit, CL) of patients free from all-cause hospitalization and survival were 48.6% (40.7, 56.0) and 82.2% (75.1, 87.4). Of the 96 patients with PoPH in OPUS, 29.2% were classified as in need of liver transplant due to underlying liver disease during the study; transplant waitlist registration was precluded because of PAH severity for 32.1% and 17.9% were transplanted. Hepatic adverse events (HAE) were experienced by 49.0% of patients; the most common being increased bilirubin (16.0%), ascites (7.3%), and hepatic encephalopathy (5.8%); 1.5% and 21.8% of patients discontinued macitentan as a result of HAE and non-hepatic adverse events.
Conclusion
There were no unexpected safety findings in patients with PoPH treated with macitentan. These data add to the evidence supporting the safety and tolerability of macitentan in patients with PoPH. A graphical abstract is available with this article.
Trial Registration
OPsumit® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; OPsumit® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688;
www.clinicaltrials.gov
.
Graphical Abstract...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the Combined OPUS/OrPHeUS Studies

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d2d527f021da4bc98cd27bae7d4bdc4e

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d2d527f021da4bc98cd27bae7d4bdc4e

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2364-1754

E-ISSN

2364-1746

DOI

10.1007/s41030-023-00251-x

How to access this item