Does a flashing artificial light have more or conversely less impacts on animals than a continuous o...
Does a flashing artificial light have more or conversely less impacts on animals than a continuous one? A systematic review
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Background
: Light pollution has been increasingly recognised as a threat to biodiversity, especially with the current expansion of public lighting. Although the impacts of light intensity, spectral composition and temporality are more often studied, another component of light, its flicker frequency, has been largely overlooked. However, flashin...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Does a flashing artificial light have more or conversely less impacts on animals than a continuous one? A systematic review
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dcb9c53cf0fb4153b0217efbff902585
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dcb9c53cf0fb4153b0217efbff902585
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1314-6947
E-ISSN
1314-3301
DOI
10.3897/natureconservation.54.102614
