Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of...

Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6e5a4402bfc4c5cad54a9a7ed024728

Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences

About this item

Full title

Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

Research involvement and engagement, 2020-05, Vol.6 (1), p.18-18, Article 18

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

By participating in priority-setting activities in research, patients and members of the public help ensure that important questions are incorporated into future research agendas. Surveys, focus groups, and online crowdsourcing are increasingly used to obtain input, yet little is known about how they compare for prioritizing research topics. To add...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6e5a4402bfc4c5cad54a9a7ed024728

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6e5a4402bfc4c5cad54a9a7ed024728

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2056-7529

E-ISSN

2056-7529

DOI

10.1186/s40900-020-00196-4

How to access this item