Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantage...
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Missing data can introduce bias in the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but are typically unavoidable in pragmatic clinical research, especially when patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used. Traditionally applied to the composite PROMs score of multi-item instruments, some recent research suggests that multiple imputation...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f459ac8abf404045801dcc16578ede4c
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f459ac8abf404045801dcc16578ede4c
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1471-2288
E-ISSN
1471-2288
DOI
10.1186/s12874-018-0542-6
