Jugular versus Femoral Short-Term Catheterization and Risk of Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patie...
Jugular versus Femoral Short-Term Catheterization and Risk of Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Causal Analysis of Two Randomized Trials
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Timsit, Jean-François , Bouadma, Lila , Mimoz, Olivier , Parienti, Jean-Jacques , Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté , Alfandari, Serge , Plantefeve, Gaétan , Bronchard, Régis , Troche, Gilles , Gauzit, Remy , Antona, Marion , Canet, Emmanuel , Bohe, Julien , Herrault, Marie-Christine , Schwebel, Carole , Ruckly, Stéphane , Souweine, Bertrand and Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Publisher
New York, NY: American Thoracic Society
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
New York, NY: American Thoracic Society
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
When subclavian access is not possible, controversy exists between the internal jugular and femoral sites for the choice of central-venous access in intensive care unit patients.
To compare infection and colonization rates of short-term jugular and femoral catheters.
Using data from two multicenter studies, we compared femoral and internal jugular for the risks of catheter-related bloodstream infection, major catheter-related infection, and catheter-tip colonization. We also compared the rates of dressing disruption and skin colonization. We used marginal structural models with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust on indication bias.
We included 2,128 patients (2,527 catheters and 19,481 catheter-days). We found no difference in catheter-related bloodstream infection (internal jugular 1.0 vs. femoral 1.1 per 1,000 catheter-days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [0.25-1.63]; P = 0.34), major catheter-related infection (internal jugular 1.8 vs. femoral 1.4 per 1,000 catheter-days; HR, 0.91 [0.38-2.18]; P = 0.34), and colonization (internal jugular 11.6 vs. femoral 12.9 per 1,000 catheter-days; HR, 0.80 [0.25-1.63]; P = 0.15). However, colonization was higher with femoral for female (HR, 0.39 [0.24-0.63]; P < 0.001) and, at the significance limit, catheter maintained for more than 4 days (HR, 0.73 [0.53-1.01]; P = 0.05). The absence of benefit of internal jugular before Day 5 was related to a higher skin colonization at the internal jugular site for catheters removed before Day 5. After the fourth day, dressing disruption became more frequent with femoral catheters and may explain the subsequent risk of catheter colonization. Differences in cutaneous and catheter colonization between internal jugular and femoral was suppressed by the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings.
Femoral and internal jugular accesses lead to similar risks of catheter infection. Internal jugular might be preferred for female, nonchlorhexidine-impregnated dressings users, and when catheters are left in place more than 4 days. Both sites are acceptable when a subclavian approach is not feasible. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00417235 and NCT01189682)....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Jugular versus Femoral Short-Term Catheterization and Risk of Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Causal Analysis of Two Randomized Trials
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Bouadma, Lila
Mimoz, Olivier
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté
Alfandari, Serge
Plantefeve, Gaétan
Bronchard, Régis
Troche, Gilles
Gauzit, Remy
Antona, Marion
Canet, Emmanuel
Bohe, Julien
Herrault, Marie-Christine
Schwebel, Carole
Ruckly, Stéphane
Souweine, Bertrand
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02473910v1
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02473910v1
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1073-449X,1535-4970
E-ISSN
1535-4970
DOI
10.1164/rccm.201303-0460OC