Log in to save to my catalogue

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04396562v1

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

About this item

Full title

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Journal title

World journal of urology, 2023-12, Vol.41 (12), p.3663-3669

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Purpose
Persistence or recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (prSUI) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation may be secondary to non-mechanical failure (NOMECA). It have for long been assumed to result from urethral atrophy. Its existence is now debated. As the pathophysiology of NOMECA is not elucidated, the most appropriate m...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04396562v1

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04396562v1

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1433-8726,0724-4983

E-ISSN

1433-8726

DOI

10.1007/s00345-023-04670-y

How to access this item