Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration...
Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax
Alternative Titles
Full title
Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_02128506v1
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_02128506v1
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1619-7070
E-ISSN
1619-7089
DOI
10.1007/s00259-018-4216-8
