Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Vi...
Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512–22
About this item
Full title
Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512–22
Author / Creator
Publisher
Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG
Journal title
Ophthalmic research, 2022, Vol.65 (2), p.239-243
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG
Subjects
More information
Alternative Titles
Full title
Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512–22
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_karger_primary_520029
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_karger_primary_520029
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0030-3747
E-ISSN
1423-0259
DOI
10.1159/000520029
