Log in to save to my catalogue

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1312157865

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

About this item

Full title

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2011-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e27557-e27557

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our a...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_1312157865

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1312157865

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0027557

How to access this item