Log in to save to my catalogue

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1536087732

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

About this item

Full title

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2014-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e99111-e99111

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised set of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all effectiveness trials for a specific health area. This will allow results of studies to be compared, contrasted and combined as appropriate, as well as ensuring that all trials contribute usable information. The COMET (Core Outcome...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_1536087732

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1536087732

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0099111

How to access this item