Log in to save to my catalogue

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cata...

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cata...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1694530712

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis

About this item

Full title

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0131770-e0131770

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) have attracted significant attention, as they have been reported to lower intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and have an excellent safety profile. The iStent is an example of a minimally invasive glaucoma device that has received particular attention due to its early and wide spread utilization. There is a grow...

Alternative Titles

Full title

iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_1694530712

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1694530712

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0131770

How to access this item