Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous...

Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1738752803

Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study

About this item

Full title

Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2015-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e0143726-e0143726

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Intraosseous infusion is recommended if peripheral venous access fails for cardiopulmonary resuscitation or other medical emergencies. The aim of this study, using body donors, was to compare a semi-automatic (EZ-IO®) device at two insertion sites and a sternal intraosseous infusion device (FASTR™).
Twenty-seven medical students being inexperien...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_1738752803

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1738752803

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0143726

How to access this item