Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribut...

Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribut...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_2711247567

Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribution from open ocean environmental DNA

About this item

Full title

Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribution from open ocean environmental DNA

Publisher

San Francisco: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0273670-e0273670

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

San Francisco: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is increasingly used to noninvasively monitor aquatic animals in freshwater and coastal areas. However, the use of eDNA in the open ocean (hereafter referred to OceanDNA) is still limited because of the sparse distribution of eDNA in the open ocean. Small pelagic fish have a large biomass and are widely distributed in the o...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of species-specific qPCR and metabarcoding methods to detect small pelagic fish distribution from open ocean environmental DNA

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_2711247567

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_2711247567

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0273670

How to access this item