Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Size Variability in Meta-Analysis
Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Size Variability in Meta-Analysis
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Generalization in meta-analyses is not a dichotomous decision (typically encountered in papers using the Q test for homogeneity, the 75% rule, or null hypothesis tests). Inattention to effect size variability in meta-analyses may stem from a lack of guidelines for interpreting credibility intervals. In this commentary, we describe two methods for m...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Size Variability in Meta-Analysis
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933611985
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933611985
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1754-9426
E-ISSN
1754-9434
DOI
10.1017/iop.2017.44