Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and...
Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Chopra, A. , Grainger, A. J. , Dube, B. , Evans, R. , Hodgson, R. , Conroy, J. , Macdonald, D. and Robinson, Philip
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Objective
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3T MRI against 1.5T MR arthrography (MRA) in patients with clinical femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
Methods
Sixty-eight consecutive patients with clinical FAI underwent both 1.5T MRA and 3T MRI. Imaging was prospectively analysed by two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded t...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002033452
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002033452
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0938-7994
E-ISSN
1432-1084
DOI
10.1007/s00330-017-5069-4
