Log in to save to my catalogue

Are Capital Inflows Expansionary or Contractionary? Theory, Policy Implications, and Some Evidence

Are Capital Inflows Expansionary or Contractionary? Theory, Policy Implications, and Some Evidence

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2091452094

Are Capital Inflows Expansionary or Contractionary? Theory, Policy Implications, and Some Evidence

About this item

Full title

Are Capital Inflows Expansionary or Contractionary? Theory, Policy Implications, and Some Evidence

Publisher

London: Palgrave Macmillan

Journal title

IMF economic review, 2017-08, Vol.65 (3), p.563-585

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Palgrave Macmillan

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

The workhorse open economy macromodel suggests that capital inflows are contractionary because they appreciate the currency and reduce net exports. Emerging market policy makers, however, believe that inflows lead to credit booms and rising output, and the evidence appears to go their way. To reconcile theory and reality, we extend the set of asset...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Are Capital Inflows Expansionary or Contractionary? Theory, Policy Implications, and Some Evidence

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2091452094

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2091452094

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2041-4161

E-ISSN

2041-417X

DOI

10.1057/s41308-017-0039-z

How to access this item