Log in to save to my catalogue

Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods

Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236400395

Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods

About this item

Full title

Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods

Publisher

Exeter: Elsevier Ltd

Journal title

Omega (Oxford), 2008-02, Vol.36 (1), p.45-63

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Exeter: Elsevier Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

The ELECTRE II and III methods enjoy a wide acceptance in solving multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. Research results in this paper reveal that there are some compelling reasons to doubt the correctness of the proposed rankings when the ELECTRE II and III methods are used. In a typical test we first used these methods to determine the...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236400395

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236400395

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0305-0483

E-ISSN

1873-5274

DOI

10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003

How to access this item