Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods
Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Exeter: Elsevier Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Exeter: Elsevier Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
The ELECTRE II and III methods enjoy a wide acceptance in solving multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. Research results in this paper reveal that there are some compelling reasons to doubt the correctness of the proposed rankings when the ELECTRE II and III methods are used. In a typical test we first used these methods to determine the...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236400395
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_236400395
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0305-0483
E-ISSN
1873-5274
DOI
10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003