Abstract Likelihood-based phylogenetic inference posits a probabilistic model of character state change along branches of a phylogenetic tree. These models typically assume statistical independence of sites in the sequence alignment. This is a restrictive assumption that facilitates computational tractability, but ignores how epistasis, the effect of genetic background on mutational effects, influences the evolution of functional sequences. We consider the effect of using a misspecified site-independent model on the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetic inference in the setting of pairwise-site epistasis. Previous work has shown that as alignment length increases, tree re-construction accuracy also increases. Here, we present a simulation study demonstrating that accuracy increases with alignment size even if the additional sites are epistatically coupled. We introduce an alignment-based test statistic that is a diagnostic for pair-wise epistasis and can be used in posterior predictive checks. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * https://github.com/WSDeWitt/phyload/...

Robustness of phylogenetic inference to model misspecification caused by pairwise epistasis

10.1101/2020.11.17.387365