How to best evaluate applications for junior fellowships? Remote evaluation and face-to-face panel m...
How to best evaluate applications for junior fellowships? Remote evaluation and face-to-face panel meetings compared
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Abstract Objectives To test a simplified evaluation of fellowship proposals by analyzing the agreement of funding decisions with the official evaluation, and to examine the use of a lottery-based decision for proposals of similar quality. Design The study involved 134 junior fellowship proposals (Postdoc.Mobility). The official method used two pane...
Alternative Titles
Full title
How to best evaluate applications for junior fellowships? Remote evaluation and face-to-face panel meetings compared
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2507150870
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2507150870
Other Identifiers
E-ISSN
2692-8205
DOI
10.1101/2020.11.26.400028
How to access this item
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2507150870?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=13902
