Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation–max...

Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation–max...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544695420

Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation–maximization (EM) methods in NONMEM: real data experience with complex nonlinear parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model

About this item

Full title

Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation–maximization (EM) methods in NONMEM: real data experience with complex nonlinear parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model

Author / Creator

Publisher

New York: Springer US

Journal title

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2021-08, Vol.48 (4), p.581-595

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

New York: Springer US

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

First-order conditional estimation (FOCE) has been the most frequently used estimation method in NONMEM, a leading program for population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. However, with growing data complexity, the performance of FOCE is challenged by long run time, convergence problem and model instability. In NONMEM 7, expectation–maximiz...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation–maximization (EM) methods in NONMEM: real data experience with complex nonlinear parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Author / Creator

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544695420

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2544695420

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1567-567X

E-ISSN

1573-8744

DOI

10.1007/s10928-021-09753-0

How to access this item