Log in to save to my catalogue

Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity

Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2635109626

Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity

About this item

Full title

Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Journal title

bioRxiv, 2022-03

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Introduction: Computational models are often used to assess how functional connectivity (FC) patterns emerge from neuronal population dynamics and anatomical connections in the brain. However, group averaged data is often used in this context and it remains unclear whether individual predictions of FC patterns using this approach can be made. Here, we assess the value of using individualized structural data for simulation of individual whole-brain FC. Methods: The Jansen and Rit neural mass model was employed, where masses were coupled using individual structural connectivity (SC) obtained from diffusion weighted imaging. Simulated FC was correlated to individual magnetoencephalography-derived empirical FC. FC was estimated using both phase-based (phase lag index (PLI), phase locking value (PLV)) and amplitude-based (amplitude envelope correlation (AEC)) metrics to analyze the goodness-of-fit of different metrics for individual predictions. Prediction of individual FC was compared against the prediction of group averaged FC. We further tested whether SC of a different participant could equally well predict a participants FC pattern. Results: The AEC provided a significantly better match between individually simulated and empirical FC than phase-based metrics. Simulations with individual SC provided higher correlations between simulated and empirical FC compared to using the group-averaged SC. However, using SC from other participants resulted in similar correlations between simulated and empirical FC compared to using participants own SC. Discussion: This work underlines the added value of FC simulations based on individual instead of group-averaged SC, and could aid in a better understanding of mechanisms underlying individual functional network trajectories in neurological disease. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * Figure 1 * https://github.com/multinetlab-amsterdam/projects/tree/master/modelling_paper_2021...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2635109626

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2635109626

Other Identifiers

E-ISSN

2692-8205

DOI

10.1101/2022.03.02.482608