Log in to save to my catalogue

Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-an...

Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-an...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2686426624

Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

About this item

Full title

Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publisher

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Journal title

International Urogynecology Journal, 2022-07, Vol.33 (7), p.1917-1925

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Cham: Springer International Publishing

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Introduction and hypothesis
Hysteropreservation and hysterectomy for uterine prolapse have been compared in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as the best treatment has not been definitively determined. This study aimed to summarize the available evidence in RCTs of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy.
Methods
We performed el...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2686426624

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2686426624

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0937-3462

E-ISSN

1433-3023

DOI

10.1007/s00192-021-04913-9

How to access this item