Log in to save to my catalogue

Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine–carboplatin versus gemcitabine–cispl...

Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine–carboplatin versus gemcitabine–cispl...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2729996708

Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine–carboplatin versus gemcitabine–cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Publication information

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Purpose
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, up to 50% of patients are cisplatin ineligible. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after ≥ 3 cycles of preoperative gemcitabine–carboplatin (gem–carbo) versus gemcitabine–cis...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine–carboplatin versus gemcitabine–cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2729996708

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2729996708

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1433-8726,0724-4983

E-ISSN

1433-8726

DOI

10.1007/s00345-022-04160-7

How to access this item