Log in to save to my catalogue

Conservation economics. Response to Comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs an...

Conservation economics. Response to Comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs an...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655523181

Conservation economics. Response to Comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot"

About this item

Full title

Conservation economics. Response to Comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot"

Publisher

United States

Journal title

Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2015-02, Vol.347 (6223), p.731-731

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Finney claims that we did not include transaction costs while assessing the economic costs of a set-aside program in Brazil and that accounting for them could potentially render large payments for environmental services (PES) projects unfeasible. We agree with the need for a better understanding of transaction costs but provide evidence that they d...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Conservation economics. Response to Comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot"

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655523181

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655523181

Other Identifiers

E-ISSN

1095-9203

DOI

10.1126/science.aaa1602

How to access this item