Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revasculariz...
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
United States: Elsevier Inc
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
United States: Elsevier Inc
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Current guidelines recommend against revascularization of the noninfarct artery during the index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This was based largely on observational studies with few data coming from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Recently,...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1681260990
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1681260990
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0002-9149
E-ISSN
1879-1913
DOI
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.046
