Log in to save to my catalogue

Use of Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to Compare the Vulnerabilities of Laparoscop...

Use of Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to Compare the Vulnerabilities of Laparoscop...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682892314

Use of Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to Compare the Vulnerabilities of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

About this item

Full title

Use of Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to Compare the Vulnerabilities of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

Publisher

United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health

Journal title

Journal of patient safety, 2015-06, Vol.11 (2), p.105-109

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

PURPOSETo measure the feasibility of using FMECA applied to the surgery and then compare the vulnerabilities of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy by using FMECA.
METHODSThe FMECA study was performed on each single selected phase of appendectomy and on complication-related data during the period January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2010. The risk...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Use of Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis to Compare the Vulnerabilities of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682892314

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1682892314

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1549-8417

E-ISSN

1549-8425

DOI

10.1097/PTS.0b013e318297febc

How to access this item