Log in to save to my catalogue

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmat...

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmat...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687027471

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

About this item

Full title

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

Publisher

England: Elsevier Ltd

Journal title

The Lancet (British edition), 2015-03, Vol.385 (9972), p.947-955

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: Elsevier Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Summary Background Mechanical chest compression devices have the potential to help maintain high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but despite their increasing use, little evidence exists for their effectiveness. We aimed to study whether the introduction of LUCAS-2 mechanical CPR into front-line emergency response vehicles would improve...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687027471

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687027471

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0140-6736

E-ISSN

1474-547X

DOI

10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9

How to access this item