Log in to save to my catalogue

Assessment of clinical efficacy and safety in a randomized double-blind study of etanercept and sulf...

Assessment of clinical efficacy and safety in a randomized double-blind study of etanercept and sulf...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783922465

Assessment of clinical efficacy and safety in a randomized double-blind study of etanercept and sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis from Eastern/Central Europe, Latin America, and Asia

About this item

Full title

Assessment of clinical efficacy and safety in a randomized double-blind study of etanercept and sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis from Eastern/Central Europe, Latin America, and Asia

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Journal title

Rheumatology international, 2016-05, Vol.36 (5), p.643-651

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Despite the demonstrated efficacy of etanercept for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), sulfasalazine is often prescribed, especially in countries with limited access to biologic agents. The objective of this subset analysis of the ASCEND trial was to compare the efficacy of etanercept and sulfasalazine in treating patients with AS from A...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Assessment of clinical efficacy and safety in a randomized double-blind study of etanercept and sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis from Eastern/Central Europe, Latin America, and Asia

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783922465

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1783922465

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0172-8172

E-ISSN

1437-160X

DOI

10.1007/s00296-016-3452-0

How to access this item