Log in to save to my catalogue

Response to Comments on "Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male...

Response to Comments on "Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808102664

Response to Comments on "Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male X-Linked Promoters"

About this item

Full title

Response to Comments on "Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male X-Linked Promoters"

Publisher

United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science

Journal title

Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2013-04, Vol.340 (6130), p.273-273

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Ferrari et al. and Straub and Becker wrongly claim that an error in the computational analysis calls into question the conclusions of Conrad et al. All the available evidence, including the reanalyzed genomic data, show that the conclusions and the key message of the study remain unchanged: RNA polymerase II recruitment to male X-linked promoters i...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Response to Comments on "Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male X-Linked Promoters"

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808102664

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808102664

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0036-8075

E-ISSN

1095-9203

DOI

10.1126/science.1232874

How to access this item