Log in to save to my catalogue

Response to Comments on “ Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Mal...

Response to Comments on “ Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Mal...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808102664

Response to Comments on “ Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male X-Linked Promoters”

About this item

Full title

Response to Comments on “ Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male X-Linked Promoters”

Publisher

United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science

Journal title

Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2013-04, Vol.340 (6130), p.273-273

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Ferrari
et al
. and Straub and Becker wrongly claim that an error in the computational analysis calls into question the conclusions of Conrad
et al
. All the available evidence, including the reanalyzed genomic data, show that the conclusions and the key message of the study remain unchanged: RNA polymerase II recruitment to male X-link...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Response to Comments on “ Drosophila Dosage Compensation Involves Enhanced Pol II Recruitment to Male X-Linked Promoters”

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808102664

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808102664

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0036-8075

E-ISSN

1095-9203

DOI

10.1126/science.1232874

How to access this item